Since 1970, rhetoricians have applied the ideas of Rogers—with contributions by Anatol Rapoport —to rhetoric and argumentation, producing Rogerian argument.

The Rogerian argument (or Rogerian rhetoric) is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals.

Apr 29, 2025 · Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy in which opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground.

Another approach our authors don't describe is called Rogerian argument. Based on Carl Rogers' work in psychology, Rogerian argument begins by assuming that a willing writer can find …

The Rogerian argument, inspired by the influential psychologist Carl Rogers, aims to find compromise or common ground about an issue. If, as stated in the beginning of the chapter, …

Known also as an Invitational Argument or Collaborative Rhetoric, the Rogerian Argument is a non-confrontational style of writing an argument, created by psychologist Carl Rogers in his …

Rogerian argument is often difficult for students to understand because it asks them to think about controversial topics in a different way: from the perspective of someone they disagree with.

When applied to argumentation, the Rogerian method makes use of examining counterarguments as enhancements, or concessions, rather than viewing them as completely oppositional.

Though there are always more than two sides to a debate, Rogerian arguments put two in stark opposition to one another. Summarize each side, then provide a middle path.

Dec 11, 2025 · The Rogerian method of argumentation is exactly that. Rather than proving one side is right and the other is wrong, it looks at both sides to see the common ground and reach …