The AI company's decision might be a justifiable idea, but the company appears to have done it for the wrong reason.
State and federal courts have almost uniformly ruled that searches of ALPR databases do not implicate the Fourth Amendment.
What is this even supposed to mean? Is it just self-parody?
During his family trip to England last year, Vice President J.D. Vance lectured the European Union on its approach to free ...
From today's First Circuit decision today in Bean Maine Lobster, Inc. v. Monterey Bay Aquarium Found., written by Judge ...
From the Sept. 30 decision in People v. Barraza by California Court of Appeal Justice Richard Huffman, joined by ...
In a 2019 analysis of American politics, Johns Hopkins University's Daniel Schlozman and Colgate University's Sam Rosenfeld ...
Tax revenue increased by about 3 percent last year, but spending increased twice as fast. And interest payments on the debt ...
Whatever political and cultural purposes it might have once served, the holiday brings out many of the worst excesses of ...
The NFL wants prediction markets regulated like traditional sports betting, which could limit competition for its sportsbook ...
Guilfoyle, the the current U.S. ambassador to Greece, asked a Republican fundraiser to pay off her her credit card debt.